Kanbox vs La Growth Machine: Which LinkedIn tool is best for you?

The main difference lies in their focus and approach to prospecting.

Kanbox specializes in LinkedIn prospecting with features designed specifically for the platform:

• Unlimited LinkedIn and Sales Navigator scraping included in all plans
• Visual Kanban pipelines for lead management (unique to Kanbox)
• Smart Inbox with fullscreen chat, tags, filters, and reminders
• 6+ step automation sequences with humanized delays
• Email finder with 98% deliverability included

La Growth Machine offers multichannel outreach (LinkedIn + Email + Twitter) with:

• Cross-channel sequences combining multiple platforms
• AI voice messages for LinkedIn
• Native CRM integrations (HubSpot, Pipedrive)
• Waterfall email enrichment (charged extra at $5/lead)

Key trade-offs: If LinkedIn is your primary channel, Kanbox offers better value with more LinkedIn-specific features at 75% lower cost. If you need true multichannel outreach across LinkedIn, email, and Twitter, La Growth Machine may be worth the premium.

If LinkedIn is your primary prospecting channel, Kanbox is the clear winner. Here's why:

1. Purpose-built for LinkedIn

Kanbox was designed from the ground up for LinkedIn prospecting. Every feature—from scraping to inbox management—is optimized for the platform. La Growth Machine spreads its development across multiple channels.

2. Superior lead management

Kanbox's visual Kanban pipelines let you track every lead through your sales funnel. You see exactly where each prospect stands. La Growth Machine uses traditional list views—less visual, harder to manage at scale.

3. Unlimited scraping included

Extract up to 75,000 profiles/month from Sales Navigator, events, posts, and URL imports. La Growth Machine doesn't include scraping—you need third-party tools or pay for enrichment.

4. Better price-to-value ratio

Kanbox starts at $10/month with all LinkedIn features included. La Growth Machine starts at €60/month, and you'll pay extra for enrichment ($5/lead). For a team of 3 doing LinkedIn-only prospecting, Kanbox saves over $1,500/year.

Bottom line: Don't pay for multichannel features you won't use. Choose the tool built specifically for your channel.

Kanbox pricing (all features included):

• Starter: $10/month (yearly) or $20/month (monthly) — 1 campaign, 300 leads/month, unlimited scraping
• Essential: $30/month (yearly) or $45/month (monthly) — 3 campaigns, 600 leads/month, team features
• Pro: $50/month (yearly) or $70/month (monthly) — 5 campaigns, 75K leads/month, webhooks/API
• Agency: Custom pricing — unlimited campaigns, custom proxies

La Growth Machine pricing:

• Basic: €60/month per identity — 3 campaigns max, 250 leads/month enrichment
• Pro: €120/month per identity — 6 campaigns, 400 leads/month enrichment
• Ultimate: €180/month per identity — unlimited campaigns, 1000 leads/month enrichment
• Extra enrichment: $5 per lead for verified email

Real cost comparison (team of 3, 1000 leads/month):

• Kanbox Pro: $50/month × 3 = $150/month (scraping + email finder included)
• LGM Basic: €60/month × 3 + (750 × $5) = €180 + $3,750 = ~$4,000/month

With Kanbox, you save over 95% when factoring in enrichment costs.

Yes, but with a different approach.

Kanbox integrations:

• Zapier: Connect to 5,000+ apps including HubSpot, Salesforce, Pipedrive, Slack, Google Sheets, Airtable, and more
• Webhooks: Incoming and outgoing webhooks for custom integrations (Pro and Agency plans)
• CSV export: Clean, structured exports ready for any CRM import

La Growth Machine integrations:

• Native HubSpot and Pipedrive integrations (Pro plan and above)
• Zapier/Make support
• API access on higher plans

Which is better? It depends on your needs:

• If you specifically need HubSpot/Pipedrive native sync with real-time bidirectional updates, LGM's native integrations are stronger
• If you use any other CRM or need flexibility, Kanbox's Zapier integration covers more tools with easier setup
• For most small-to-medium teams, Zapier provides all the integration power needed without the complexity

Based on reviews from G2, Capterra, and user feedback (2024-2025):

Kanbox strengths (common praise):

• "Simple and intuitive interface—I was up and running in 10 minutes"
• "The Kanban pipelines are a game-changer for lead tracking"
• "Best value for LinkedIn prospecting, period"
• "Unlimited scraping saves us thousands in enrichment costs"
• "Customer support is fast and helpful"

La Growth Machine strengths:

• "Powerful multichannel sequences when you need LinkedIn + email"
• "AI voice messages get attention"
• "Native CRM integrations work well"

La Growth Machine pain points (common complaints):

• "Steep learning curve—took weeks to fully understand the platform"
• "Pricing is confusing and adds up quickly with enrichment"
• "Occasional bugs with automation sequences"
• "Inbox management is basic compared to dedicated tools"
• "No visual pipeline—hard to track leads at scale"

Bottom line: Users consistently rate Kanbox higher for ease of use, value, and LinkedIn-specific features. LGM scores well for multichannel capabilities but receives criticism for complexity and pricing.

It depends on your sales workflow and primary channels.

Choose Kanbox if your team:

• Primarily prospects on LinkedIn and Sales Navigator
• Needs visual pipeline management (Kanban boards)
• Wants unlimited scraping without per-lead costs
• Values simplicity and quick onboarding
• Has budget constraints (Kanbox is 75% cheaper)
• Needs team features like shared pipelines and lead pools

Choose La Growth Machine if your team:

• Runs true multichannel campaigns (LinkedIn + cold email + Twitter)
• Needs native HubSpot/Pipedrive sync
• Wants AI voice messages for LinkedIn
• Has budget for premium pricing and enrichment costs

For most B2B sales teams, LinkedIn is the primary prospecting channel. If that's true for your team, Kanbox delivers better results at a fraction of the cost. You're not paying for email and Twitter features you won't use.

Kanbox automation sequences:

• 6+ steps: Profile visit → Follow → Like post → Connection request → Message → Up to 6 follow-ups
• Humanized delays: Random intervals between actions (e.g., 1-3 days between steps)
• Conditional logic: Different paths based on prospect responses
• A/B testing: Test message variants to optimize response rates
• Smart scheduling: Send during business hours in prospect's timezone
• Templates: Pre-built sequences for common use cases

La Growth Machine automation:

• 4 steps: Connection request → Message → 2 follow-ups (on Basic)
• Multichannel: LinkedIn + Email + Twitter in same sequence
• Voice messages: AI-generated voice notes
• Advanced branching: Complex conditional logic (Pro plan)

Key difference: Kanbox offers more LinkedIn touchpoints (6+ vs 4 steps) with superior humanization. LGM adds multichannel capability but with fewer LinkedIn-specific steps. For LinkedIn-focused prospecting, Kanbox sequences are more comprehensive.

Both tools take account safety seriously, but with different approaches:

Kanbox safety features:

• Cloud-based: Actions run from Kanbox servers with rotating IPs
• Daily limits: Respects LinkedIn's recommended action limits automatically
• Random delays: Humanized intervals between all actions
• Smart throttling: Slows down if unusual activity is detected
• Business hours: Actions sent during normal working hours

La Growth Machine safety features:

• Cloud-based: Uses dedicated 5G proxies per account
• Action limits: Configurable daily limits
• Warm-up period: Gradual ramp-up for new accounts

Important note: No automation tool is 100% safe. LinkedIn actively detects automation. Both tools minimize risk, but you should:

• Start with conservative limits (20-30 connection requests/day)
• Use personalized messages (no obvious templates)
• Avoid running multiple tools simultaneously
• Keep your LinkedIn profile complete and active